Edwin N. Misquitta And ANR. v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And ORS.

27-IA-7455-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7455 OF 2025 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2025.04.22 18:34:34 +0530 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 12353 OF 2025 Edwin N. Misquitta And Anr.

...Appellants

Versus

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai And Ors.

...Respondents

------ Mr. Deepak Chitnis Chiparikar for the Appellant. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare i/by Adv. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent-Corporation. ------ Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

Date : April 21, 2025.

P. C. :

1.

Interim Application has been preferred seeking condonation of delay of 16 days caused in preferring the Appeal. 2.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the concerned Advocate who was engaged for the purpose of filing the Appeal had undergone angioplasty and therefore the Appeal could not be filed within time.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation opposes the Application.

4.

Considering the explanation for delay is that due to ill health of the advocate on record the delay has occurred, the explanation is accepted. The delay of 16 days stands condoned. Shubham Talle 1 of

27-IA-7455-2025.doc 5.

Interim Application is allowed.

6.

List the above First Appeal for admission on 5th May, 2025. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Shubham Talle 2 of