Rajesh Jagannath Naik v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Chief Secretary And ORS

Ingale 29-ia-9299-25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date:

2026.03.24 10:46:58 +0530 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9299 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 37400 OF 2024 Rajesh Jagannath Naik ... Applicant/Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

.... Respondents **** Mr. Tribhuvan SP Sharma i/b Mr. Narayan G.Rokade a/w Mr. Swapnil S.Kalokhe, for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. Y.D. Patil, AGP for the Respondent No.1- State. Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar (through VC) a/w Ms. Rutuja Bhor, Ms.Radhika Kurdukar, for Respondent No.5.

Mr. Anil D'Souza a/w Mr. Mark Dbritto i/b Ernest Tuscano, for Respondents No. 6 & 7.

**** CORAM :

M.S.KARNIK & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATE :

23rd MARCH 2026 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner. 2.

Learned counsel for respondent no. 6 seriously objected to the restoration of the writ petition. It is pertinent to note that even notices have not been issued in the said writ petition. The registration of the said writ petition was refused for non-removal of the office objections. Therefore, at this stage, we are satisfied

Ingale 29-ia-9299-25.odt with the reasons provided in the application for restoration and accordingly, we set aside the order passed by Registrar (Judicial-I) by giving an opportunity to the applicant for removal of the office objections.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application, we are satisfied that the order dated 12/02/2025 needs to be set aside. 4.

The interim application is allowed. The order dated 12/02/2025 passed by Registrar (Judicial -I) is set aside. 5.

Learned counsel for the applicant assures that office objections will be removed within a period of 2 weeks from today. 6.

The writ petition is restored to file.

7.

The interim application is disposed of.

(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (M.S.KARNIK, J.)