The Municipal Corporation Of Greater, Bombay v. Putramal Chandmal Punamiya

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION. NO. 9904 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1296 OF 2011 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 15/07/2025 None present As per office note, notice issued to sole respondent is returned unserved with Bailiff's remark, "Not found and said premises was found locked".

The learned Advocate for Applicant is not aware about new address. Thus, only option left is to serve the sole respondent by way of substituted service.

The Learned Advocate has taken out present Interim Application to serve sole respondent by way of substituted service.

In turn, Interim Application No. 9904 of 2025 for substituted service is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), returnable by 10 weeks.

The learned Advocate for the Applicant is directed to collect copy of Publication Notice from the department within two weeks and thereafter, publish the same in the newspaper and file published copy of newspaper within 08 weeks from the date of this order. The learned Advocate is directed to do all the exercise within 10 weeks from the date of this order.

sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)