← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/10041/2025dismissed

Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Fasahat Husen Aganuddin Khan And ORS.

2026-04-07Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - Ii)2 pages

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. 21 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10041 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1668 OF 2025 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : DR. M.S. DESHPANDE REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 07/04/2026 None Present The learned advocate for the applicant is absent. His absence is unexplained.

The notices of respondent Nos. 1 to 6 are returned unserved. Therefore, the above numbered Interim Application is listed on the board of registrar for second time for taking steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 6. However, learned advocate for applicant has neither taken any steps nor supplied proper and correct addresses of respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 6

(1) (e) of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960, Immediately after the expiry of the period prescribed under the foregoing sub-rule of this rule for taking the requisite steps for the issue of fresh notice or or supplying postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges, the office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which steps have not been taken for the issue of fresh notices or the postal stamps

to cover the postal and registration charges have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss the matter for failure to prosecute.:

As such, the prescribed time to take steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 6 as provided under Rule 1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to take steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

In turn, learned advocate for the applicant is directed to take appropriate steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 6 within 02 weeks without fail. On failure, Interim Application would stand dismissed against unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 6 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat-R(J-II)-07.04.2026