Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai v. Mohan Satyawan Pednekar And ORS.

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION. NO. 10047 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL(ST) NO. 23878 OF 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 17/07/2025 None present As per office note, notice issued to Respondent No. 4 is returned unserved with Bailiff's remark dated 01/01/2025, "Not found, the area of village is very vast and no one give any information about the said respondent no. 4".

The learned Advocate for Applicant is not aware about new address. Thus, only option left is to serve the Respondent No. 4 by way of substituted service.

The Learned Advocate has taken out

present Interim Application to serve Respondent No. 4 by way of substituted service.

In turn, Interim Application No. 10047 of 2025 for substituted service is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), returnable by 10 weeks.

The learned Advocate for the Applicant is directed to collect copy of Publication Notice from the department within two weeks and thereafter, publish the same in the newspaper and file published copy of newspaper within 08 weeks from the date of this order. The learned Advocate is directed to do all the exercise within 10 weeks from the date of this order.

Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat-R(J-II)-17.07.2025