← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/10442/2025disposed off

Satyendra Balasaheb Bhonsale v. Ramnath Bansilal Golecha And ORS.

2025-09-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil3 pages

LSP 1 18 fast 22660.25 group.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Interim Application No.10442 of 2025 In First Appeal (st) No.22660 of 2025 Satyendra Balasaheb Bhonsale ...

Appellants V/s.

Ramnath Bansilal Golecha and others ...

Respondents With First Appeal No. 1176 of 2022 With Interim Application No.3324 of 2025 In First Appeal No.1176 of 2022 Balkrishna Mahadeo Thorat ...

Appellant V/s.

Chandradevi Laxman Bhonsale ...

Respondents With First Appeal (st) No.10662/2023 Kushagra Ashok Kadam ...

Appellant v/s.

Ramnath Bansilal Golecha ...

Respondents Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date:

2025.10.10 17:58:33 +0530 Mr. Namitkumar S. Pansare Advocate for the Appellants in FA(st) No.10662/23.

Ms. Radhika Navandar a/w. D.B.

Gade Advocate for the Appellants in FA and applicants in IA 10442/25 and 10444/25.

Ms. Trushna Shah i/b. Tejesh Dande & Associates Advocate for Respondent Nos.12a in 1176/2022 and Respondent No. 1 in Appeal (st) No.22660/25.

LATA SUNIL PANJWANI

LSP 2 18 fast 22660.25 group.doc CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J DATE : 30th September 2025.

P.C. :

Interim Application No.10442/2025 Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant/Defendant No.13. He intends to prefer an appeal thereby challenging the judgment and decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.1249/2008. There is a delay of 2014 days in preferring an appeal. The learned Advocate for Respondent No.1-Ramnath-Plaintiff wants to file reply to the said applications.

2.

It is submitted that Respondent Nos.2 to 16 are the parties who are supporting the present Appellant. Also heard learned Advocate for Respondent No.17. It is submitted that Respondent No.18 is served. Let the Applicant to file affidavit of service. 3.

Stand over to 14th November 2025.

First Appeal No. 1176 of 2022 4.

When the matter is called out, no one is present on behalf of the Appellant. Stand over to 14th November 2025.

LSP 3 18 fast 22660.25 group.doc Interim Application No.3324 of 2025 In First Appeal No.1176 of 2022 5.

Ad-interim order granted earlier, if any, to continue till next date.

First Appeal (st) No.10662/2023 6.

Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant/Defendant No.17. He intends to challenge the judgment dated 26th September 2019 passed in Special Civil Suit No.1249/2008. There is a delay. Learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 wants to file affidavit-in-reply. Learned Advocate has got instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent No.14. She is at liberty to file Vakalatnama till next date. If he wants, he can file affidavit-in-reply.

7.

Let all these matters be listed on 14th November 2025. (S.M. MODAK, J.)