← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/10694/2025dismissed for noncomplying conditional order

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Thane (W) v. Mr. Mohammed Asif Mohammed Muslim Bedlam

2025-10-16Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl Ii)2 pages

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10694 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1547 OF 2025 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRI. S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 16/10/2025 None Present The above numbered Interim Application is listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notice to sole respondent.

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies - Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute. As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02

weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

In turn, the learned advocate for the applicant is directed to supply necessary copies within 02 weeks (excluding Diwali Vacation) without fail. On failure, the Interim Application would stand dismissed against sole respondent without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, issue notice to sole respondent, returnable by ten weeks.

Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat-R(J-II)-16.10.2025