← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/11038/2025disposed off

Shakur Sikandar Shaikh v. Jalindar Pandurang Jadhav

2025-08-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar2 pages

910 IA 11038.25 IN SAST 13224.22.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11038 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.13224 OF 2022 Shakur Sikandar Shaikh & Ors.

...Applicants In the matter between:- Shakur Sikandar Shaikh & Ors.

...Appellants

Versus

Jalindar Pandurang Jadhav

...Respondent

BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2025.08.16 11:02:22 +0530 Mr. Venkatesh A. Shinde, Advocate for Applicants.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

13th August 2025 P.C.:

1.

The Interim Application is taken out for setting aside Order dated 16th November 2022 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial-II) and for restoration of the Second Appeal to the file of this Court.

2.

The Second Appeal has been dismissed for non removal of the office objections, by conditional order dated 16th November 2022 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial-II). 3.

Learned Counsel for the Applicants states that the Second Appeal was dismissed for non removal of office objections at preDusane

910 IA 11038.25 IN SAST 13224.22.DOC admission stage and notice has not also been issued to the Respondent.

4.

Accordingly, for the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed. The Order dated 16th November 2022 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial-II) dismissing Second Appeal by conditional Order and directing refusal of registration of the Second Appeal alongwith Interim Applications is set aside.

5.

Consequently, the Second Appeal is restored to the file of this Court on the condition that the objections shall be removed within twelve weeks from today.

6.

Accordingly, Interim Application is disposed of in above terms, with no order as to costs.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) Dusane