Union Of India v. Sakribai Valu Vir And ORS.

36-FA(ST)-23295-2025+IA(ST)-30097-2025+IA-11173-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.23295 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.30097 OF 2025 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR [FOR DELAY CONDONATION] SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2025.09.16 19:16:47 +0530 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11173 OF 2025 [FOR STAY] Union of India :

Through the General Manager Central Railway, CSMT, Mumbai ...Applicant In the matter between:- Union of India :

Through the General Manager Central Railway, CSMT, Mumbai ...Appellant V/s.

Sakribai Valu Vir and Ors.

...Respondents

***** Mr.Niranjan Prabhakar Shimpi:- Advocate for Applicant/Appellant.

*****

CORAM

:

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

12th SEPTEMBER 2025 P. C. :- INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.30097 OF 2025 1.

Heard learned Advocate Shri.Shimpi for the Applicant. 2.

He intends to file an Appeal against the Judgment dated 4th February 2025 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal - Mumbai Bench in Claim Application No : OA (IIU)/MMC/2016/0274. There Satish Sangar 1/2

36-FA(ST)-23295-2025+IA(ST)-30097-2025+IA-11173-2025.doc was a direction to pay compensation of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakh) along with the interest. There is a delay of 10 days. Whereas according to Mr.Shimpi, in fact there is no delay because from getting the certified copy, the Appeal is filed in time. Be that it may, for the reasons stated in the Application, the delay is condoned in terms of prayer clause (a). Application is disposed of accordingly. FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.23295 OF 2025 3.

Issue notice to the Respondents returnable on 10th October 2025.

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11173 OF 2025 4.

Stay is granted to the execution of the Judgment dated 4 th February 2025 passed by the the Railway Claims Tribunal - Mumbai Bench in Claim Application No : OA (IIU)/MMC/2016/0274 subject to deposit of the decretal amount along with the interest within a period of 4 weeks before the learned Railway Claims Tribunal - Mumbai Bench.

5.

Accordingly, the Stay Application is disposed of. 6.

The Claimants are at liberty to apply for withdrawal before this Court.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2