Sushila Vasant Mandlik Proprietor Rajesh Mandlik Company v. Doshal Meghraj Barot Since Decd Through Lrs

901-SA-296-2020+IA-12371-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.296 OF 2020 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12371 OF 2025 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2025.10.14 11:18:46 +0530 Sushila Vasant Mandlik ...Appellant/Applicant V/s.

Doshal Meghraj Barot and Ors.

...Respondents

***** Mr.Vaibhav Patankar:- Advocate for Appellant/Applicant.

Mr.Bharat Gadhavi:- Advocate for Respondent No.1.

*****

CORAM

:

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

10th OCTOBER 2025 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant/Plaintiff and learned Advocate for Respondent No.1.

2.

She expired on 4th January 2021. A copy of death certificate is annexed to the Application. There is a delay for filing this Application. The submission is the Appellant has settled the matter with the concerned Respondents and the 'consent terms' are required to be filed. Learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 assures that he will file Vakalatnama for the Legal Representatives of deceased - Respondent No.1. He is having 'No objection'.

Satish Sangar 1/2

901-SA-296-2020+IA-12371-2025.doc 3.

In view of that, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d). Amendment to be carried out within one

(1) week from today. The Legal Representatives are at liberty to file Vakalatnama.

4.

Stand over to 26th November 2025.

5.

If the parties will sign the '

consent terms ', they are at liberty to mention the matter.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2