Himani Tapan Thatte Alias Ms. Himani Pradip Kulkarni v. Tapan Milind Thatte

1/2 929 IA 12479-25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12479 of 2025 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST NO.27052 OF 2025 Himani Tapan Thatte @ Ms. Himani Pradip Kulkarni ..

Applicant

Versus

Tapan Milind Thatte ..

Respondent ...

Ms.Sakshi S. Kadam with Virendra Deshmukh for the applicant. Mr.Narayana B. Suvarna for the respondent.

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ DATED : 12th JUNE, 2026 P.C:- The application seek condonation of delay of 48 days in filing an Appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 12/3/2025, which dissolved the marriage solemnized between the parties, but rejected the prayer of the applicant for permanent alimony.

On perusal of the application, we are satisfied with its bonafides and though the application faces a strong opposition from the counsel for the respondent on the ground that no specific cause has been set out for condoning the delay, we find that explanation offered in paragraph no.5 of the application to Tilak

2/2 929 IA 12479-25.doc be sufficient to condone the delay, as the said paragraph will have to be read with paragraph no.8 of the application. Interim Application is made absolute.

FCA St No.27052/2025 Learned counsel waives notice for respondent. We permit the learned counsel for the respondent to file his response to the claim for permanent alimony in the Appeal on or before 97/2026.

List the Appeal for further consideration on 16/7/2026. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Tilak