Tasneem Khatri v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai

909-910.IA.12832.2025-Delay.doc Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date:

2025.11.21 19:43:08 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ANANT KRISHNA NAIK CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(909) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12832 OF 2025 (FOR DELAY CONDONATION ) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 33929 OF 2025 Tasneem Khatri ...Applicant/Appellant

Versus

The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai & Ors

...Respondents

AND

(910) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12834 OF 2025 (FOR DELAY CONDONATION ) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 33933 OF 2025 Nisha Thakur Mansharamani ...Applicant/Appellant

Versus

The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai & Ors.

...Respondents

**** Mr. Khan Javed Akhtar for the Applicants/Appellants. Mr. Pradeep M. Patil for the Respondent-MCGM. ****

CORAM

: M. M. SATHAYE, J.

DATED : 21st NOVEMBER 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

These Interim Applications are filed for condonation of delay in filing First Appeals. According to the office note, in IA/12832/2025, there is a delay of 129 days and in IA/12834/2025 there is a delay of 81 days in filing Appeal.

akn 1/2

909-910.IA.12832.2025-Delay.doc 3.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent-Municipal Corporation has opposed the condonation of delay contending that sufficient cause is not made out.

4.

Considering the averments in the Applications about reason for delay and considering that the substantive First Appeals are sought to be filed, sufficient cause is made out.

5.

Subject to the Applicants/Appellants paying the costs of Rs.15,000/- (in both applications) to the Respondent-Municipal Corporation, within a period of three weeks from today, the Interim Applications are allowed and the delay is condoned.

6.

Both the Interim Applications are disposed of in above terms. (M. M. SATHAYE, J.) akn 2/2