Ms. Prabhjeet Kaur Bamraha v. Mr. Harpreet Singh Bamraha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13771 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9478 OF 2024 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2024 Ms. Prabhjeet Kaur Bamraha ...Applicant/ Appellant

Versus

Mr. Harpreet Singh Bamraha

...Respondent

Ms. Devyani Kulkarni a/w. Ms. Rashika Agarwal, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant.

Ms. Taubon Irani, Advocate for the Respondent. Mr. Harpreet Singh Bamraha, Respondent present.

CORAM:

BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED:

23 JANUARY 2026.

PC:- 1.

The application filed by the applicant seek modification of order dated 26.07.2024, access was granted to the father on every weekend. The Court directed that the father shall fetch the child from the residence of the mother on every Friday and the child was permitted to be taken to Nashik and he shall be taken to the mother by evening on Sunday.

Posing the hazardous task of the child being required to Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date:

2026.01.23 19:04:41 +0530 RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER travel on every weekend to Nashik situated at the distance of

approximately between 160 to 180 kilometers, an application is moved for relaxing the said stringent condition. 2.

On hearing the respective counsel and in presence of the respondent, a consensus is arrived to the following effect: (i) On the third weekend in a month, the child shall remain in Mumbai, but the father will avail the access in Mumbai by taking the child from the mother and continuing to be with him, as per the same schedule, but ensuring that by 6:00 p.m. of Sunday, the child shall be returned to the mother; (ii) When the access is availed in Mumbai, it is permissible for the father to stay with the child in a hotel and it would also be permissible for him to have his parents or close relations with him;

(iii) On rest of the weekends, the arrangements worked out by the Court in order dated 26.07.2024 shall be followed; 3.

When the above order was passed with consent of parties, Ms. Taubon Irani representing the father make it clear that though the father has willingly agreed to modify the arrangement, the mother shall not make any complaints about the child being fed with outside food, because there will be no option then to cater to him in the hotel.

4.

With this understanding between the parties inter se, we dispose of the application. Needless to say that the earlier orders shall remain unaffected.

5.

We intend to continue this arrangement till the end of April 2026, and, thereafter, parties are at liberty to approach the Court by seeking any further alteration/arrangement, which is most convenient for the child.

6.

Interim Application No. 13771 of 2025 is disposed of. 7.

List the Appeal for hearing on 20.02.2026.

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) {