Indu Magan Amritkar v. Sumanbai Balu Nikam

by SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN Date:

2026.03.25 18:25:40 +0530 SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN 25-SA-242-2021.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.242 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2278 OF 2021 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.242 OF 2021 Suman Balu Nikam And Ors.

...Appellants/ Applicants

Versus

Indu Magan Amritkar And Ors.

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13810 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.242 OF 2021 Indu Magan Amritkar ...Applicant/ Respondent

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Suman Balu Nikam And Ors.

...Appellants

Versus

Indu Magan Amritkar And Ors.

...Respondents

------ Mr. Krishna Shukla h/f Mr. Pranil Sonawane for the Appellants Mr. Narayan Rokade a/w Mr. Swapnil Kalokhe for the Applicant in IA/13810/2025 / Respondent No.1 in SA/242/2021 ------ CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : MARCH 25, 2026 SQ Pathan 1/2

25-SA-242-2021.doc P. C. :

1.

By an order of 16th March 2026, this Court had recorded that if the appeal is not argued on the next occasion, the same will be dismissed for non-prosecution.

2.

Despite the said order, learned counsel appearing for the Appellants seeks time. The order was necessitated as there is an adinterim stay which has been operating since the year 2021 and the Appellants have been seeking adjournment on one ground or the other.

3.

As learned counsel appearing for the Appellants is unable to argue the matter, the Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 4.

Interim Applications do not survive for consideration and stand disposed of.

[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] SQ Pathan 2/2