Lawrence Fernandes v. Philip Anton Parmar

902-WP-7269-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7269 OF 2022 Philip Anton Parmar

...Petitioner

Versus

The Grievance Redressal Committee, Bombay Suburban Mumbai And Ors

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13856 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13855 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7269 OF 2022 ------ Ms. Aditi Naikare a/w Mr. Pradeep Thorat, for the Petitioner. Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP, for the Respondent No.2-State. Mr. Shubham Patil h/f Mr. Anoop Patil, for the Respondent No. 3. ------ CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : June 17, 2026 P. C. :

1.

The present Petition impugns order dated 4th January, 2018, passed by the Grievance Redressal Committee dismissing the Appeal, and the consequence was that the Petitioner was held ineligible. 2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that subsequently, eviction proceedings were initiated in which fresh inquiry was ordered, and thereafter, by order dated 8th June, 2026, the Petitioner has been Arya 1 of

902-WP-7269-2022.doc declared as eligible.

3.

In view of the subsequent order holding the Petitioner eligible, the impugned order, which was prior in point of time, stands superseded. As the Petitioner has now been declared eligible, the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration.

4.

It is open to the Respondent to challenge the order dated 8th June, 2026, by which the Petitioner has been held eligible, in accordance with law. With these directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

5.

Interim Applications do not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.

[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Arya 2 of