Shri. Ganesh Undra Chaudhai v. Shree Sandip Baban Dabhade And ANR.

23-IA38279-2025INCRAST37484-2025.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38279 OF 2025 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 37484 OF 2025 Ganesh Undra Chaudhary ...Applicant SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI

Versus

Sandip Baban Dabhade and ors.

...Respondents

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.02.18 17:50:03 +0530 Adv. Saroj Pagare, for the Applicant.

Smt. Sunita Khobragade, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

17th FEBRUARY, 2026 PC:- IA/38279/2025 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents.

3.

Smt. Khobragade, the learned Counsel, submits that she has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2.

4.

An affidavit-in-reply is filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 contending that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have no objection to condone the delay of 240 days.

1/2

23-IA38279-2025INCRAST37484-2025.DOC 5.

For the reasons assigned in the application and no objection on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, the delay in filing the revision application stands condoned. 6.

The application stands allowed.

CRA(ST)/37484/2025 7.

The revision application assails the final judgment and decree in RCS/400/2024, dated 20th August, 2024, passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Bhiwandi, 8.

Revision Application against a final judgment and decree is not maintainable.

9.

Keeping open the liberty to assail the decree in an appropriate proceeding, the revision application stands disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2