Akilesh Eswaran And ANR v. Ms Radius Estates And Developers Private Limited
PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Pallavi PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2025.12.19 13:04:37 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38584 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 37991 OF 2025 Ramanathan Elayaperumal And Anr.
...Applicants INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38585 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38003 OF 2025 Abdul Abdullah Raoof And Anr.
...Applicants INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38586 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38006 OF 2025 Sajid Sulaiman And Anr.
...Applicants INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38587 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38008 OF 2025 Akilesh Eswaran And Anr.
...Applicants
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38589 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38011 OF 2025 Vipul Kant Mishra And Anr.
...Applicants INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38590 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38017 OF 2025 Vaikuntam Srinivasan And Anr.
...Applicants INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38591 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38021 OF 2025 Yadagiri Rao Jupally And Anr.
...Applicants INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38592 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38025 OF 2025 Venkatesham Neela And Anr.
...Applicants
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38593 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 38027 OF 2025 Venkatarishnan Neelakantan ...Applicant INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38594 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38030 OF 2025 Satish Agrawal ...Applicant INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38595 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38034 OF 2025 Shivashish Misra ...Applicant INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38596 OF 2025 SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO. 38033 OF 2025 Madhusudhana Reddy Uparlapalli ...Applicant
______________________________________________________ Mr. Foram Vora, i/b. Amicus Lex & Associates for Applicants. Adv. Protyusha Thanawala i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Respondent No.1.
______________________________________________________ CORAM : Advait M. Sethna, J.
DATED : 19 December 2025 P.C.:- 1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Ms.
Vora, learned counsel for the Applicants/Appellants would at the very outset invite the Court's attention to an order dated 17 December 2025 passed by this Court. She would submit that in the connected Second Appeals and Interim Applications therein, there is delay of one day and the same has been condoned. These Interim Applications have been duly allowed.
3.
Today, there are connected Second Appeals and Interim Applications therein which are listed before this Court. The delay is of one day in these Interim Applications. Such delay has been sufficiently explained. Sufficient cause to condone such delay has been made out.
4.
This is more particularly because in the connected proceedings the Interim Applications have been allowed by an order dated 17 December 2025. The delay is thus neither
deliberate nor intentional.
5.
For all these reasons, all Interim Application as stated in the cause title are allowed. All Interim Applications are disposed of. No costs.
(Advait M. Sethna, J)