Preeti Vipin Bora v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

112-WP-4517-2024 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4517 OF 2024 Vipin Ishwarlal Bora

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2025 Preeti Vipin Bora

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

_________________________________________________________________ Mr. Sumit Kothari along with Mr. Rajendra Gurjar, Advocate for Petitionerhusband in WP/4517/2024 and Respondent No.2 in APL/66/2025. Mr. Prashant P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. H. M. Pawar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in WP/4517/2024 and Applicant in APL/66/2025.

_________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 27th MARCH, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

It is contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner-husband is out of his house for five years. He wants to visit the Palladium Society in front of Big Bazaar, Kothrud, Pune but the Trial Court has directed not to visit the residence of respondent No.1 at 1301-A in Palladium Society. If this Court directs, the Trial Court to expedite the trial, this Court may dispose of the writ petition.

2.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the petitioner Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2026.04.02 12:56:09 +0530 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM has other two residences but only to harass respondent No.2-wife, he

112-WP-4517-2024 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam petitioner wants to visit the said society. Respondent No.2-wife has filed complaint against the petitioner-husband as he forcibly tried to visit the said society. If this Court expedites the Trial, respondent No.2-wife has no object for it.

3.

Learned APP submits this appropriate orders be passed. 4.

Considering the submission of all learned counsel, it appears that it is a dispute between husband and wife. The offence was registered in 2021, since then, there is no progress in the trial. Considering this fact, the Trial Court is requested to expedite the Trial and dispose the same as early as possible.

5.

In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6.

In view of disposal of writ petition, criminal application No.66 of 2025 (for cancellation of bail) also stands disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)