Vijay Dattatrey Kharkar v. The State Of Maharashtra

114- appln 388 of 2025.doc TIKAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 388 OF 2025 Vijay Dattatrey Kharkar ...Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2026.04.09 15:38:58 +0530 _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Manvi Sharma i/by Saurabh Butala, Advocate for Applicant. Smt. R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.

PSI Vishnu Govnida Wagh, NRI Sagari Police Station, Navi Mumbai present.

_________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 7th APRIL, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for the State.

2.

By this application, the Applicant is seeking relaxation of condition imposed by this Court by order dated 08/05/2025. 3.

It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicant that by order dated 08/05/2025, this Court has imposed the condition that Applicant shall not enter into the limits of District Thane and Raigad except to attend the dates before the trial Court till conclusion of the trial. Learned counsel further submits that the co-accused, having similar allegations, have been released on bail but this condition has not been imposed on them and requested to allow the application.

114- appln 388 of 2025.doc TIKAM 4.

Learned APP strongly objected to allow the application for relaxation of condition.

5.

Considering the submission of learned counsel and reasons mentioned in the application, I pass following order:

ORDER

(i) Application is allowed.

(ii) Condition No. (c) imposed by this Court vide order dated 08/05/2025 imposed on the Applicant is relaxed. (iii) Applicant shall attend the police station, as and when required. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)