Satish S/O Balasaheb Gaware v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

p2-appln-684-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.684 OF 2025 SATISH S/O BALASAHEB GAWARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. R. G. Hange a/w Mr. A. R. Hange, advocate for the applicants. Mr. P. S. Patil, APP for respondent No.1/State. Mr. A. P. Bhandari, Advocate for respondent No.2. ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 24 SEPTEMBER 2025 ORDER :

.

This matter was reserved for order on 03.09.2025, however, we have come across the decision in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni vs. The State of Maharashtra and another in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri.) No.13424 of 2025 decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 03.09.2025 before pronouncing the order. Then we thought that applicant should not be put to loss, as the law has been explained in Pradnya Kulkarni (supra) which would be applicable to the cases which are pending and, therefore, the matter was taken up on board today. Learned Advocate for applicant and learned APP submit that the charge [1]

p2-appln-684-2025.odt sheet was already filed and cognizance of the offence has been taken. Under such circumstance, the applicant prays for leave to amend. Leave is granted.

2.

Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks. 3.

Stand over to 10.11.2025 [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]