Nitin Sudam Lobhe v. Sunita Nitin Lobhe And Another

2026:BHC-AUG:14529 36-sr929.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1815 OF 2025 IN REVNST/5047/2025 Nitin Sudam Lobhe

VERSUS

Sunita Nitin Lobhe And Another WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1816 OF 2025 IN REVNST/5047/2025 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 5047 OF 2025 ---- None present for applicant Mr.V.A.Patil, Advocate h/f. Mr.S.B.Choudhari, Advocate for respondents ---- CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.

DATE : APRIL 02, 2026 ORDER :- In view of the order dated 26.03.2026, this matter is posted today. The order dated 26.03.2026 reads thus:- It appears from the recitals of the order dated 26.02.2026 that the learned counsel then appearing for the applicant sought leave to have his name discharged, as his client had engaged another counsel. This Court has accordingly discharged Mr. S. S. Wakure, learned counsel then appearing for the applicant. Notice was issued to the applicant. The office remarks indicate that the notice has been duly served upon the applicant.

36-sr929 2.

Today, none appears for the applicant.

3.

Stand over to 02.04.2026 for passing orders.

2.

It appears that on 26.03.2026, despite having been served with the notice of the court, nobody caused appearance for the applicant. Hence, the matter was posted today for passing order. Today also, in the morning session when the matter was called out, nobody appeared for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was kept back and again was called out in the second session. In the second session also, nobody caused appearance for the petitioner. 3.

Mr.V.A.Patil, learned counsel holding for Mr.S.B.Choudhari, learned counsel for the respondent is present. It appears the petitioner has lost his interest to prosecute the petition. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] ...........

KBP