Vaishnavi Uttareshwar Lad v. Santosh Dinkar Shep And Another
2025:BHC-AUG:16323
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 936 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1051 OF 2025 SANTOSH DINKAR SHEP
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr.S.T.Mahajan APP for Respondent-State : Mr.P.P.Dawalkar ...
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2204 OF 2025 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.1051/2025 ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 27.06.2025 P.C. :
1] Heard. For the reasons stated in Criminal Application No.2204/2025 for assisting to P.P., the same is allowed. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. 2] Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned APP for the respondent-State and the learned counsel for assist to P.P.
3] The applicant is seeking bail as he is arrested on 04.05.2025 in connection with Crime No.125/2025, registered with Yusufwadgaon Police Station, Tal. Kaij,
District Beed, for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 74, 75, 118 (2), 118 (1), 351 (2) r/w. 34 of BNS, 2023.
4] The case against the applicant is that the applicant along with co-accused have assaulted the informant and her mother and both are arrested on 04.05.2025.
5] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the investigation qua the applicant is complete and the applicant is in jail since 04.05.2025.
6] The learned counsel for assist to P.P. submits that the applicant is involved in similar offence and FIR No.0154/2022 was registered with the same police station against the present applicant. However, the learned APP, on instructions, submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the present applicant.
7] The learned counsel for the applicant produced the documents, which indicates that in the FIR No.0154/2022, 'B' summary is filed by the concerned court. 8] The injury certificate produced by the learned APP shows that the injured have suffered simple injuries. The weapons are recovered and the applicant is in jail from
04.05.2025. Considering the nature of injury, so also, there are no criminal antecedents against the present applicant, the applicant is granted bail. In the event the applicant is found in similar offence, the prosecution would be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail. In view of the same, the application is allowed in the following terms : a] The applicant shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.125/2025, registered with Yusufwadgaon Police Station, Tal. Kaij, District Beed, for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 74, 75, 118 (2), 118 (1), 351 (2) r/w. 34 of BNS, 2023, on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
b] The applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of concerned Police Station, till filing of the charge sheet.
c] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall not contact the informant, in any manner whatsoever, during the pendency of the trial. d] The applicant shall co-operate with the trial Court and he shall attend each and every date, unless exempted by the trial Court.
e] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution and he shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.
f] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall place on record of the trial Court the details of his Contact Number and residential address with updates in case of any change.
9] Needless to say, in case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled. It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present bail application. The concerned Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.
10] The application stands disposed of.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC