Shahzad Shaikh Naeem Qureshi And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 87 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2344 OF 2025 SHAHZAD SHAIKH NAEEM QURESHI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. S.S. Jadhav, Advocate for applicants - absent Mrs. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, APP for respondent No.1 ...

CORAM :

SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE :

29th SEPTEMBER, 2025 ORDER :

.

Learned Advocate for applicants is absent. If he remains absent on next date i.e. on 25.11.2025, application is liable to be dismissed. Learned APP informs that cognizance of the matter has been taken by the trial Court.

Though learned Advocate for applicants is absent, leave is granted to amend, in view of Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni vs. The State of Maharashtra and another in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri.)

87_Cri.Appln_2344_2025 No.13424 of 2025 decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 03.09.2025. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks. Stand over to 25.11.2025.

( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) agd