Chand Maheboob Sayyed v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

21-Criappl-3358-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3358 OF 2025 IN APEALST/9154/2025 Chand Maheboob Sayyed

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another .....

Mr. U. S. Mitkari h/f Mr. Kulkarni Mukul S., Advocate for Applicant Mr. A. D. Wange, APP for Respondent No.1 - State Ms. Smita Chole (Kendre), Advocate for Respondent No.2 .....

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3359 OF 2025 IN APEALST/9154/2025

CORAM

:

NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

DATE :

01.12.2025 PER COURT :

[I] Order in Application No.3358/2025:

1.

This is the Application for condonation of 333 days delay in preferring the Appeal against conviction.

2.

Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant, learned APP for Respondent No.1 - State and the learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 - Victim.

3.

For the reasons mentioned in the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause - 'A' and same stands disposed of accordingly.

21-Criappl-3358-2025.odt [II] Order in Criminal Appeal :

1.

This is the Appeal against conviction.

2.

Admit.

3.

Issue notice to the Respondents. The learned APP waives service of notice for Respondent No.1 - State and the learned Advocate Ms. Chole waives service of notice for Respondent No.2 - Victim. 4.

Call Record and Proceedings with Paper-book.

[III] Order in Application No.3359/2025 :

1.

This is the Application for suspension of sentence. 2.

Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable after one [01] weeks. The learned APP waives service of notice for Respondent No.1 and the learned Advocate Ms. Chole waives service of notice for Respondent No.2 - Victim. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/December-2025