Rushikesh Mangalsing Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

925-REVN-59-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2025 Rushikesh Mangalsing Patil

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

------------------------- Mr. K. A. Ingle for the Applicant.

Mr. A. M. Phule, APP for the State.

------------------------- CORAM :

ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.

DATE :

11 JULY 2025 P. C.:

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Mr. Ingle, learned Advocate for the Applicant points out that Respondent No.2-victim is duly served. However, she is not represented. 3.

Considering this position, the High Court Legal Aid Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad is directed to appoint an Advocate to represent Respondent No.2. It shall be done on or before the adjourned date of hearing.

4.

List the proceedings for further consideration on 25 July 2025. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] Shubham