Nitin Ramesh Sapkal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
1 of 2 909-APEAL.690.2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 690 OF 2025 NITIN RAMESH SAPKAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...
Mr. Suraj Rajendra Mantri, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. D. B. Bhange, APP for Respondent No.1-State. ...
CORAM :
SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE :
7th OCTOBER, 2025 P.C.:- 1.
Though the service to Respondent No.2 is still awaited. Mr. Suraj Mantri, learned Advocate for the Appellant is insisting for protection by way of ad-interim order.
2.
Mr. D. B. Bhange, learned APP has made available the investigating papers for the perusal of this Court. Upon examining the same, a case for grant of ad-interim protection is made out. Accordingly, ad-interim protection is granted in terms of prayer clause (e).
3.
In the meanwhile, there shall be ad-interim order in the following terms :- A] Till the next date, in the event the Appellant is arrested in connection with FIR No.0428 of 2025 dated 22nd July 2025, registered with Ardhapur Police Station, District Nanded, he shall be released on bail Tauseef
2 of 2 909-APEAL.690.2025 on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties in the like amount.
B] The Appellant shall remain present before the investigating officer as and when required by the investigating officer.
C] The Appellant shall co-operate with the investigation, including producing all documents in his possession, as may be demanded by the investigating officer. D] The Appellant shall not influence the informant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case and he shall not tamper with the evidence.
4.
Needless to say, violation of any of the aforesaid conditions may result in this order being cancelled.
5.
List on 4th November 2025. Ad-interim protection granted today to continue till the next date.
6.
In the meantime, the concerned investigating officer shall submit the report regarding the service of notice upon Respondent No.3.
(SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) Tauseef