Navita Borkar v. Diksha Naik

CRMA 76 of 2025 Sonam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2 OF 2025 NAVITA BORKAR ... APPLICANT

Versus

DIKSHA NAIK ... RESPONDENT Mr. Sanman Keny, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Vinod Gaunkar holding for Mr. Ashlyn Gomes, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM:- SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.

DATED :- 30th September, 2025 P.C.:

1. Heard learned Advocate for the respective parties.

2. The learned Advocate for the Applicant has placed on record the proposal with respect to the expenses which she would incur for the accommodation. A copy of the same has been given to the learned Advocate for the Respondent to take instructions and file a counter proposal in writing, so that the Applicant can consider the same, if its acceptable.

3. Stand over to 14.10.2025.

SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.

30th September, 2025