← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/327/2025disposed off

Rani Rajendra Rajput And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2025-08-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil3 pages

ssm 1 25-wp327.2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 327 OF 2025 Rani Rajendra Rajput & Ors.

.....Petitioners Vs.

State Of Maharashtra & Anr.

.....Respondents _____________________________________ Adv. Mr. Zaid Anwar Qureshi a/w Adv. Aaisha M. Patel i/by Hulyalkar & Associates for the Petitioners.

Mr. Vinod Chate APP, for the Respondent-State. Ms. Tajasvi Jadhav, PSI attached to Hijawadi Police Station, present _____________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2025.

P.C.:- 1) By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are seeking quashing of CR No.1379 of 2024 dated 10th December, 2024 registered with Hinjawadi Police Station, PimpriChinchwad Police Commissionerate for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 189(1), 189(2) and 190 of BNS. 2) Learned APP on instructions from Ms. Tajasvi Jadhav, PSI attached to Hijawadi Police Station, Pimpri-Chinchwad Police Commissionerate submitted that, after completion of investigation of the present crime, the police have filed charge-sheet on 1st April, 2025 in the Court of 6th JMFC, Shivaji Nagar, Pune.

3) In view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1/3

ssm 2 25-wp327.2025.doc the case of Neeta Singh & Ors. Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (Cri.) No. 13578/2024, dated 15/10/2024, present Petition for quashing of FIR has become infructuous. 4) There is another facet to the present Petition. As the police have already filed charge-sheet, the Petitioners have alternate statutory remedy by way of filing Applications for discharge before the trial Court. 5) It is the settled position of law and as has been decided by a catena of decisions by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, ordinarily the Court will not entertain the Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, where the Petitioner has an alternative remedy, which without being unduly onerous, provides an equally efficacious remedy.

Though no hurdle can be put against the exercise of the constitutional powers of the High Court, it is well recognized principle which gained judicial recognition that, the High Court should direct party to avail himself of such remedies, one or the other before he resorts to the constitutional remedy. 5.1) Reliance is placed on the following decisions:- i) Thansingh Nathmal Vs.The Superintendent of Taxes, Dhubri & Ors., reported in AIR 1964 SC 1419.

ii) A. Venkatasubbiah Naidu Vs. S. Chellappan & Ors., reported in (2000) 7 SCC 695.

iii) Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr. Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil, reported in (2010) 8 SCC 329.

2/3

ssm 3 25-wp327.2025.doc iv) Radhey Shyam & Anr. Vs. Chhabi Nath & Ors., reported in (2015) 5 SCC 423.

v) Genpact India Private Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr., reported in (2019) 419 ITR 440 (SC). vi) Virudhunagar Hindu Nadargal Dharma Paribalana Sabai & Ors. Vs. Tuticorin Educational Society & Ors., reported in (2019) 9 SCC 538.

vii) Magadh Sugar & Energy Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors., reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 801.

6) According to us, filing an Application for discharge before the trial Court is not an onerous remedy and in fact an equally efficacious remedy. The Petitioners cannot be permitted to raise a specious plea calling upon this Court to adjudicate his innocence in a Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is against the settled principles of law. At the same time, the Petitioners cannot be permitted to make the statutory provisions of the Cr.P.C./BNSS otious, by directly approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 7) In view of the above and by reserving the remedy of filing an Application for discharge before the trial Court in favour of the Petitioners, Petition is disposed off.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) by SANJIV SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR Date:

2025.09.08 18:54:59 +0530 3/3 SANJIV SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR