Deepak Purshottam Makhija And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

54.WP.390.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 390 OF 2026 Deepak Purshottam Makhija And Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

State Of Maharashtra And Anr.

...Respondents

Ms. Pradnya Sonawane a/w Kirti Kataria, for the Petitioners Ms. Priyanka Pardeshi, for the Respondent No. 2 along with Respondent No. 2 Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM:

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATED:

29th JANUARY, 2026.

PC:- 1.

This matter was taken up at the request of the learned Advocate for the Petitioners at 6:28 pm. When the matter was called out, Ms. Pradnya Sonawne, learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner states that though the Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are present in Court, the Petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 are unable to appear today.

2.

She submits that they are unable to even join on VC mode. Arjun

54.WP.390.2026 3.

Ms. Sonawne, learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioners states that indulgence be shown to the Petitioners and the matter be kept tomorrow.

4.

She requests for permission to permit the Petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 to appear on VC. Permission granted.

5.

At the request of Ms. Sonawane, learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioners, list the matter on 30th January, 2026. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) { Arjun