Beatrice Antony v. M/S Concretech India Through Mr Sagar B Kamble And ANR

910-WP-757-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.757 OF 2025 Beatrice Antony

...Petitioner

Versus

M/s Concretech India Through its authorised person Mr Sagar B Kamble & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.759 OF 2025 Beatrice Antony

...Petitioner

Versus

M/s Concretech India Through its authorised person Mr Sagar B Kamble & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.847 OF 2025 Beatrice Antony

...Petitioner

Versus

M/s Concretech India Through its authorised person Mr Sagar B Kamble & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.848 OF 2025 Beatrice Antony

...Petitioner

Versus

M/s Concretech India Through its authorised person Mr Sagar B Kamble & Anr.

...Respondents

Arjun

910-WP-757-2025.doc ------ Mr. Santosh Thakur, for the Petitioners.

Ms. Lalita P. Savekar, for Respondent No.1.

Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, APP, for the Respondent-State. ------ Coram: Madhav J. Jamdar, J.

Date: June 16, 2026 P.C.:

1.

Mr. Thakur, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petitions. However, he submits that the contentions which are raised in the Writ Petitions be kept open to be agitated before the learned Trial Court.

2.

Accordingly, the Criminal Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as sought.

3.

All contentions are expressly kept open.

[Madhav J. Jamdar, J.] Arjun