Pritesh Prakash Dugad v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

LSP 1 27 wp 911.25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No. 911 of 2025 Pritesh Prakash Dugad ...

Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

...

Respondents Mr. Saurabh Butala & Harshad Sathe Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. H.J. Dedhia APP for the State.

Mr. R.Y. Ahire, PSI, Kurla Police Station present.

Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date:

2025.07.31 12:40:08 +0530 CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J LATA SUNIL PANJWANI DATE : 28th July 2025.

P.C. :

Heard learned Advocate Sathe for the Petitioner. Initially noncognizable offence is registered, however, later on the proper complaint is filed consisting of allegations relating to cognizable offence. Learned Magistrate called for a police report. It does not favour the allegations in the complaint. Still learned Magistrate issued a process for the offences under Sections 452 and 506(ii) r/w Section 34 of the IPC.

2.

These grounds can be raised in a revision to be filed before the Sessions Court. Mr. Sathe tried his level best to convince me that

LSP 2 27 wp 911.25.doc there are additional documents which cannot be considered by the Revisional Court.

3.

He wants to place reliance on the judgments. Stand over to 1st August 2025 on supplementary Board.

(S.M. MODAK, J.)