Rajesh Nandlal Rathod v. Baliram Govind Pawar And ANR

20. WP 1745-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1745 OF 2025 Rajesh Nandlal Rathod .Petitioner ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME

Versus

Baliram Govind Pawar & ors.

.Respondents Mr. Jyotiram S. Yadav (Through VC), Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr. N. B. Patil, APP, for Respondent No. 5 - State ______________________________________________________ by ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2025.07.29 20:12:06 +0530 CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 25.07.2025 P. C.

1.

When the matter was called out, no one was present on behalf of the Petitioner.

2.

Later on, Mr. Yadav appeared through VC on behalf of the Petitioner.

3.

Process was issued against the Accused by learned JMFC, 1st Court, Kalyan vide Order dated 06.08.2016 passed below Exh. 1 in O.M.A.No. 114 of 2014 on his complaint for the offences punishable under Sections 430, 452, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It was set aside by learned Additional Sessions Judge - 6, Kalyan, District - Thane vide Order dated 10.10.2024 passed in Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 130 of 20216. The complaint was also set Anand

20. WP 1745-2025.doc aside. That is why the present Petition is filed by the Complainant. Let the Petitioner to satisfy the Court that the Writ Petition is maintainable and not the revisional proceedings. If on the next date, learned Advocate for the Petitioner does not remain present, the Court will pass appropriate Orders.

4.

Stand over to 22.08.2025 under the caption "For Directions". (S. M. MODAK, J.) Anand