Shubham Son Of Omshankar Pandey v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

LSP 1 17 wp 1810.25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.1810 of 2025 Shubham Omshankar Pandey ...

Petitioners V/s.

State of Maharashtra and anr.

...

Respondents.

Mr. Digajmann Mishra i/b. Yashmann Mishra i/b. Brahmand Lexis LLP for the Petitioners.

Mr. Arpit Kusum Ashok for the Respondent No.2 (original Complainant).

Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State.

PI Prajakta Pawar, Versova Police Station, Mumbai. LATA SUNIL PANJWANI LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date: 2025.04.16 16:13:22 +0530 CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 9th April 2025.

P.C. :

Learned APP states that in this case the charge-sheet is filed. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners as well as learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 submitted that the Respondent No.2 has no objection for quashing of the proceedings. However, since the charge-sheet is not annexed, it is not possible to consider that request today.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners is granted leave to annex the copy of the charge-sheet and to carry out the corresponding amendment in the petition. Amendment be carried out within a

LSP 2 17 wp 1810.25.doc period of two weeks from today.

3.

Stand over to 24th April 2025.

(S.M. MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL,J)