Sadhana Devendra Ingale v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

904. WP 1939 of 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1939 OF 2025 Sadhana Devendra Ingale

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

***** Mr. Ajinkya Udane Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Mandar Bagkar Advocate for the Respondent Dadaraje Pawar API - IOChaturshrungi Police Station, Pune Mr. H. J. Dedhia APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

08th AUGUST 2025 P. C. :- 1.

Mentioned out of turn.

2.

Heard the learned Advocate Shri Udane for the Petitioner. Even though he has not obtained NOC of the earlier Advocate, he has got instructions to appear. He undertakes to file Vakalatnama in the office within two weeks.

3.

As observed on the last date, i.e. 06.08.2025, this Writ Petition by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2025.08.12 11:33:48 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/2

904. WP 1939 of 2025.doc will not be maintainable because there is a challenge to the judgment of acquittal passed by the Court of JMFC, Pune. There is a remedy of appeal provided under the law.

4.

Learned Advocate Mr. Udane seeks liberty to withdraw this petition and to file an appeal before the appropriate Court. 5.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to prefer an appeal before the appropriate court. 6.

If there is delay, then the period spent during prosecuting this petition be considered while condoning the delay. 7.

All contention of the parties are kept open.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2