Rashmi Saluja v. Directorate Of Enforcement And ANR

64-WP.2538.2025.doc JVS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2538 OF 2025 Dr. Rashmi Saluja } Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Anr.

} Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2254 OF 2025 Dr. Rashmi Saluja } Petitioner versus Directorate of Enforcement } Respondent Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Senior Advocate (through VC) with Mr. Avinash Tripathi, Mr. Sankalp A. Sharma, Mr. Ameya Vaidya, Advocates for the Petitioner in both petitions. Mr. Zohaib Hussain (through VC) with Ms. Pranjal Tripathi and Mr. Anil D. Yadav, Advocates for Directorate of Enforcement.

Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for State in WP/2538/2025.

CORAM:

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ. & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

DATE:

11th DECEMBER 2025 P.C.:

Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, the learned senior counsel tenders compilation of judgments and brief note on behalf of the petitioner, which is taken on record.

2.

Mr. Zohaib Hussain, the learned counsel for the Directorate of Enforcement joined the Court proceedings through virtual mode and referred to the judgments and relevant provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the Companies Act, 2013.

64-WP.2538.2025.doc 3.

Mr. S. V. Gavand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has also controverted the argument that the cognizance order is without application of mind.

4.

Arguments concluded.

5.

Judgment is reserved.

by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date:

2025.12.15 20:04:56 +0530 JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE]