Madhu Mallah v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

18-wp-2432-25 Gokhale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2432 OF 2025 Madhu Mallah ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..Respondents __________ Ms. Sakshi Baadkar i/b. Mr. Mohd. Shayan Usmani a/w. Mohan Rao, Sulabha Rane, Pranjal Pandey and Sangram Parab for Petitioner.

Smt. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for State/Respondent. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 5 MAY 2025 PC :

1.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, states that she is not pressing the prayer clause (b) which is for quashing of the proceedings. She submitted that her limited prayer is for expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No.1010/PW/2019 pending before the learned J.M.F.C., 32nd Court, Bandra. The incident is of May 2018. The case is pending since 2019. Therefore, the request for directions to expedite the trial is reasonable. 2.

The J.M.F.C., 32nd Court, Bandra is requested to decide Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2025.05.06 13:12:46 +0530 VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE

18-wp-2432-25 the trial as expeditiously as possible. The prosecution and all the accused shall co-operate with the early disposal of the trial. 3.

With these observations, the petition is disposed of. It is made clear that, prayer clause (b) is not pressed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner.

(S. M. MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)