Vishal Khanna v. Bhishan Steel Industries Through Rajiv J Sareen And ANR.

906-WP-3278-2025.DOC Arun Sankpal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3278 OF 2025 Vishal Khanna ..Petitioner

Versus

Bhishan Steel Industries Through Rajiv J Sareen & Anr

...Respondents

Mr. Siddharth Jagushte, for the Petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Ghag, APP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

18th SEPTEMBER 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner No.1. 2.

None appears for the Respondent No.1-complainant. 3.

Mr. Thevar Subramanian seems to have filed vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent No.1 To rule out the possibility of prejudice and by way of indulgence, stand over to 25th September 2025. To be ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL listed high on board.

ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2025.09.19 11:46:25 +0530 4.

It is hereby made clear that, if none appears for the Respondent No.1 on the next date, the Court would be constrained to hear and decide the Petition on the basis of the available material on record. 1/2

906-WP-3278-2025.DOC 5.

In the meanwhile, the Trial Court shall defer the hearing of the Case No. 317/SS/2018, beyond 25th September 2025. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2