Pratik Navneetlal Shah v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

KVM 45 - WP 3421-2025 .doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2025.07.14 16:53:07 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3421 OF 2025 Pratik Navneetlal Shah

...Petitioner

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

______________________ Mr. Hitesh Prajapati a/w. Mr.Vishal V. Kurtukade i/B. Professional Chanakya Legal LLP for Petitioner.

Mr. Ajay S. Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 1 - State. Mr. Mohan P. Tekavde a/w. Ms.Swati M. Tekavde, Ms.Sanjana Shivkar, Ms.Rhea Jaiswal, Ms.Kajol Mhatre, Mr.Chinmay Bhagat, Ms.Mrudula Kadam for Respondent No.2.

Mr.Sanjay Jagtap, PI, Sion Police Station, Mumbai present. Respondent No.2 present in person.

______________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 02nd JULY, 2025 P.C.:- 1) As per the submissions of the learned Advocate for Petitioner, the offence alleged against the Petitioner is compoundable as contemplated under Section 320 of Criminal Procedure Code before the trial Court. Thus, the Petitioner is having substantive alternate statutory remedy under the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code.

Facing with the said difficulty, learned Advocate for Petitioner 1/2

KVM 45 - WP 3421-2025 .doc seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to avail the said remedy. 1.1) Leave and liberty granted.

2) Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2