Ravindra R Yadav v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

6 Wp-3517-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3517 OF 2025 Ravindra R Yadav

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

***** None for the Petitioner Adv. Shyam Dewani a/w Adv.

Sachet Makhija i/by Dewani Associates Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 Ms. R. S. Tendulkar APP for the Respondent No. 1State API Ughade EOW P. N. Jadhav CA - present ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

08th JULY 2025 P. C. :- 1.

When the matter is called out, no one is present on behalf of the Petitioner. The learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 submitted that the petition is not maintainable because the order was passed by the designated Court as per the provisions of the MPID Act on 19.04.2025 and there is remedy of appeal provided. Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2025.07.09 18:46:15 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/2

6 Wp-3517-2025.doc 2.

By the impugned order, the claim for return of the property is rejected. The objection is correct.

3.

In view of that, the Petition is disposed of with liberty to challenge that order by way of an appeal.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2