Rekha Harischandra Varatha v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date:

2025.08.04 16:08:56 +0530 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD 932.WP-4105-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4105 OF OF 2025 Rekha Harishchandra Varatha ....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ....Respondents ---- Mr. Viral Rathod a/w. Mr. Vishwatej Jadhav i/b. Mr. Mangesh Nalawade for the Petitioner.

Mr. S.V. Gavand, Addl. PP for the Respondent - State. ---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.

DATE : 1st AUGUST, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

We have heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioner. With his assistance, we have gone through the Petition Paper Book. 2.

It is undisputed that the Writ property regarding which the Petitioner is agitated, does not belong to her. She does not have any documents to show her title to the property. There is no declaration of any Civil Court establishing her right, title or interest in the said property.

Gauri Gaekwad

932.WP-4105-2025.odt 3.

By this Petition, the Petitioner prays that the complaint lodged before the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-5, Thane, be investigated and that Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 be invoked.

4.

We have perused the complaint. What is mentioned in the complaint is "सदर घराचा माझी प्रॉपर्टी असल्याने मी ताबा घेण्यास गेली असता सामनेवाले हि ने बॉडीगार लोकांना बोलावून मला व माझ्या मुलींना हिद. १९.०५.२०२५ रोजी घाणेरडी शि.वीगाळ करुन मला व माझ्या मुलींना ठार मारण्याची धमकी हिदली आ े". We do not find that such allegations would be sufficient to attract the aforesaid two Sections. 5.

In view of the above, this Petition is dismissed. (GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Gauri Gaekwad