Priti Niraj Mehta v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2025.08.18 11:35:28 +0530 Trupti 9-wp-4351-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4351 OF 2025 Mrs.Priti Niraj Mehta ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ...

Mr.Shashvat Jariwala i/b. Auroma Law for the Petitioner. Mr.Mayur Sonawane, APP for Respondent No.1, State. Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil with Mr.Dhavalsinh Y. Patil for Respondent No.2- CBI. ...

CORAM

:

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.

DATE :

13th August, 2025 P.C.:- 1.

The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2 CBI, ACB Unit, Mumbai, submits that, firstly, there is no Look Out Circular (LOC) against the Petitioner. Secondly, the chargesheet has already been filed in the Special Court, and it is mentioned in the chargesheet that there is no material against the Petitioner to indicate that she is guilty of any offence.

2.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is satisfied.

1/2

Trupti 9-wp-4351-2025 3.

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off as being infructuous.

4.

Needless to state, since there is no embargo, the Petitioner can travel abroad unless she is an accused in any other case or if any LOC in connection with another crime is in force against her. (GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) 2/2