Pravin Ragunath Mundhe v. Sneha Pravin Mundhe And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4869 OF 2025 Pravin Raghunath Mundhe

...Petitioner

Versus

Sneha Pravin Mundhe & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Sagar Talekar, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh More, Advocate for Respondents.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

10th December 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Sagar Talekar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Rajesh More, learned Counsel for the Respondents. 2.

By the present Writ Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the challenge is to the legality and validity of the common Order dated 1st July 2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in PWDVA Appeal No. 169/2024 and PWDVA Appeal No. 206 of 2024, as also the challenge is to the Order dated 19th September 2024 passed by the learned J.M.F.C. Court No. 1, Pune below Exhibit-5 in PWDVA No. 3468 of 2022. By the impugned Order dated 19th September 2024, the learned J.M.F.C. has directed the Petitioner to provide to the Respondent No.1, an accommodation of 1 BHK and till that time to pay

Rs.15,000/- per month towards accommodation. The learned J.M.F.C. also directed payment of maintenance at the rate of Rs.25,000/- per month. The said Order of the learned J.M.F.C. is confirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. 3.

The learned J.M.F.C. has observed that it is an admitted position that the Applicant is doing tours and travels business in the name of Amol Travels and he is having luxury busses. 4.

Mr. More, learned Counsel for the Respondents submitted that the Petitioner is the owner of huge lands and part of the land belonging to the Petitioner has been acquired by the M.I.D.C. Learned Counsel submits that the Petitioner has received about Rs.5,00,00,000/- (Rs. Five Crores only) as compensation from M.I.D.C.

5.

Mr. Talekar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions of the Applicant, confirms that certain portion of the land has been acquired by M.I.D.C. and the Petitioner has received compensation of Rs.5,00,00,000/- (Rs. Five Crores only). In fact, the perusal of record shows that B.M.W. Car and some other four wheelers also stand in the name of the Petitioner.

6.

Thus, in the facts and circumstances, no case is made out for interference in the impugned Order under the Writ Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 7.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)