← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5228/2025dismissed as withdrawn

Sumitkumar Uttam Bhoumik v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2025-12-08Hon'Ble The Chief Justice , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad2 pages

BDP 7 crwp-5228-25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5228 OF 2025 Sumitkumar Uttam Bhoumik .... Petitioner.

V/s State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.... Respondents.

Mr. Vignesh Ashoken i/b Mr. Sachin S. Deokar, advocates for the petitioner.

Mr J.P. Yagnik, Addl. P.P. for the respondent no.1-State of Maharashtra.

CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

DATE : 8th DECEMBER 2025.

P.C. :

The petitioner prays for the following reliefs:- "(a) this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the criminal proceeding being Sessions Case No.485 of 2020 before Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune arising out of F.I.R. No.15 of 2020 registered with Chikhali Police Station, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 on such terms and conditions as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;

b) pending the hearing and final disposal of this Criminal Writ Petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to stay all the further proceeding of Sessions Case No.485 of 2020 before Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune arising out of F.I.R. No.15 of 2020 registered with Chikhali Police Station, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860:

c) interim/ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) above be granted;

(d) to pass any such other and further orders as your Lordship deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

BDP 7 crwp-5228-25.doc 2.

Mr. J.P. Yagnik, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor states that cognizance of the offence has been taken by the Court concerned.

3. In view thereof and considering Rule 2(II)(h) under Chapter I of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition/application, if so advised.

4. Writ Petition No.5228 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. All contentions are kept open. [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2025.12.11 16:19:22 +0530