Neethu Cijo (Antony) Jose (Nee. Neethu(Mary) Thomas v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1/2 8 WP 5922-25.odt TILAK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5922 OF 2025 Neethu Cijo (Antony) Jose Nee.

Neethu (Mary) Thomas ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors ..

Respondents ...

Adv. Ghazala Khan a/w Adv. Umar Siddiqui & Adv. Shazia Qureshi i/b Neethu Cijo i.e. Petitioner.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP for respondent-State.

Adv. Cijo (Antony), respondent in person present. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE AND SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATE : 18th NOVEMBER, 2025 ...

P.C:- The Petitioner seek issuance of writ of habeas corpus, with a direction to the respondent no.2 to produce the sons, and for grant of their full custody to the petitioner. It is worth to note that there is a decree of mutual consent passed by the Family Court at Bandra in F 3966/2024 wherein the issue of the custody and access of children is specifically dealt with.

2/2 8 WP 5922-25.odt If there is any allegation that there is a breach of the conditions, the remedy is open before the Family Court. On being confronted with the aforesaid situation, the learned counsel seek permission to withdraw the Petition, with liberty to avail such remedy as is available in law. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.)