Prakash Mogal Londhe Of Nashik v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

by LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN Date:

2026.03.13 22:13:36 +0530

(906) WP-5924.25.DOCX LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN lgc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5924 OF 2025 Prakash Mogal Londhe of Nashik : Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra And Anr : Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr. Mandar Goswami a/w Mr. Siddhant Choudhari for the Petitioner.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for the Respondent/State. Mr. Sameer Vaidya a/w Adv. Zainab Khan, Adv. Amit Pradhan Adv. C Gore for Respondent No.2.

PC Suchitsing Solunke from Ambad Police Station present. ______________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATED : 13 March 2026 PC:- 1.

Mr. Mandar Goswami, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, states that during pendency of the present Petition, investigation is complete and chargesheet has been filed. He, therefore, on instructions from the Petitioner, craves leave to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings questioning the impugned FIR, chargesheet and the order taking cognizance. He relies on the decision of the

(906) WP-5924.25.DOCX Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pradnya Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni V/s. State of Maharashtra1.

2.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned APP, for the Respondent/State and Mr. Sameer Vaidya, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 do not object to the request and liberty as sought for by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner. 3.

In view of the statement made by Mr. Mandar Goswami learned Advocate for the Petitioner, leave granted to withdraw the present Petition with liberty as prayed for. 4.

Writ Petition No.5924 of 2025 is disposed of as withdrawn.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1948