Mukeshkumar Keshavlal Patel And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Amk 69-wp 6258-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6258 OF 2025 Mukeshkumar Keshavlal Patel & Anr.

... Petitioners Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents _______________________________ Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Sheetang Shah, Ms. Mukta Kothari i/b Vraj Legal for the Petitioners.

Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate (through VC) a/w. Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate, Mr. Mahesh Agarwala, Mr. Zulfiquar Menon, Mr. Vivek Jain, Mr. Chirag Naik, Ms. Vaijayanti Sharma, Mr. Mahesh Ahire, Mr. Swapnil Srivastava, Mr. Jayesh Srivastava, Mr. Kshemendra Bharadwaj, Mr. Kapil Madan, Mr. Gurumukh Singh Arora, Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari i/b MZM Legal LLP for Respondent No.3.

_______________________________

CORAM

: A. S. GADKARI AND RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE , JJ.

DATED : 23rd DECEMBER, 2025.

P. C. :- 1) Mr. Rohatgi, learned senior counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 on instructions submitted that, in pursuance of the statement of the concerned officer of Respondent No.3 recorded by the police, the Crime bearing No. 693 of 2025 dated 22nd December, 2025 under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 61(2) of the B. N. S., 2023, has been registered with Vikroli Police Station, Mumbai. 1/2

Amk 69-wp 6258-25.doc 2) In view thereof, the cause of action for filing Petition as of today does not survive. The Petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed off.

3) Needless to state that, in the event, the Petitioners challenge the FIR before the appropriate Court, all the contentions of both the parties are expressly kept open to be agitated thereof. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2