Keshav Lakshman Gohil v. The State Ofmaharashtra

110-REVN-271-2025 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 271 OF 2025 Keshav Lakshman Gohil ...Applicant

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

____________________________________________________________ by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date:

2026.05.08 12:03:46 +0530 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Mr.Prashant Pandey i/b W3Legal LLP, for the Applicant. Ms.Kranti T. Hiwrale, APP for Respondent-State. ____________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 7th MAY 2026 P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned APP for the Respondent-State.

2.

The learned counsel for the Applicant submit that the Sessions Court has rejected the Discharge Application, but after passing impugned order the Applicant has received Forensic Report he seeks permission of withdrawal of this Application with liberty to file fresh Application before the Trial Court on the basis of new documents. 3.

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the Applicant, the Application is allowed to withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

4.

The Trial Court shall decide the discharge Application, if any,

110-REVN-271-2025 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble filed by the Applicant on its own merit and as per law and without influenced by the previous order.

5.

All pending Applications are disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)