Aditya Ashok Patil And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

54-Apeal 86-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2025 Aditya Ashok Patil & Anr.

... Appellants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents .............

Mr. Mudassar A. Killedar h/f Ms. Sushma Mishra, Advocate for the Appellant. Smt. Ranjana Humane, APP for the State.

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATED : 17 th MARCH, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned APP. 2.

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that during the pendency of the appeal, the appellants have been arrested. Hence, he seeks to withdraw this appeal as infructuous.

3.

Considering the submission of the appellant, the appeal stands disposed of as infructuous.

( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Amk 1/1