Vishal Tanaji Chavan v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

S.S.Kilaje 76-APEAL-162-2025 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 162 OF 2025 Vishal Tanaji Chavan ... Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents .............

Mr. Samay Pawar i/b. Mr. Yash Fadtare, Advocate for the Appellant. Smt. P. P. Bhosale, APP for the State.

Mr. Rohit Rajbhar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATED : 6th MAY, 2025.

P. C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No.2.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submitted that in the order dated 16.04.2025 his name is inadvertently mention as "Adv. Rohit Rajbhor" instead of "Adv. Rohit Rajbhar", it be corrected accordingly. 3.

In view of above, the order dated 16.04.2025 be corrected accordingly.

4.

The Registry is directed to correct the name of the Advocate for respondent No.2 as mentioned above on the online portal too. 5.

At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, stand over to 13th June, 2025.

( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2025.05.08 15:19:26 +0700 SONALI SATISH KILAJE 1/1