Arvind Raghunath Jadhav And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

85-APEAL-335-2025 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 335 OF 2025 Arvind Raghunath Jadhav And Anr.

.... Appellants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra And Anr.

.... Respondents ----- Mr. Dhananjay Thoke, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. Prashant P. Jadhav, APP, for the Respondent - State. Mr. Hrishikesh Giri, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. Sharad L. Sonawane, Respondent No.2 - in person present. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date:

2025.04.25 15:15:57 +0530 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Appellants, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 2.

Mr. Hrishikesh Giri learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that he has instructions to appear in this matter on behalf of Respondent No.2, hence he seeks time.

3.

Learned counsel for the Appellants strongly objected to allow an adjournment on the ground that no interim relief is granted to the Appellants.

4.

Considering the submissions of all learned counsel, last Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2

85-APEAL-335-2025 (CR).doc chance is given to the Respondent No.2 to go on with the matter. On the next date, if Respondent No.2 fails to argue the matter, this Court would decide the matter on merit.

5.

On the last date, this Court had appointed Advocate from Legal Aid Panel to represent for Respondent No.2, her appearance is discharged.

6.

Stand over to 28th April, 2025.

( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2